In Case You Were Wondering . . . AP US History Test May 8, 2015 . . . Get Ready!


























Monday, April 30, 2012

Option D -- Richard Nixon


Richard Milhous Nixon, as president, did some amazing things...amazingly good and amazingly bad . . .
a. Should history be kind to Nixon and elevate him to the level he deserves, or will history be unkind to Nixon and dump him on the ash heap of history where he belongs? Explain.
b. Provide ONE specific factual statistic to support your answer to (a).
c. Include the proper citation (web address is okay) of the source of your statistic in (a).
d. MAKE SURE YOUR STATISTIC is UNIQUE...NO TWO STUDENTS MAY HAVE THE SAME STAT...FIRST IN WINS!
e. Most Importantly . . . put your first name, last name, and class period on your comment so you get credit!

Monday, April 16, 2012

MLK vs. Malcolm . . . Turn the Other Cheek vs. An Eye for an Eye . . . Either way you're going to get hurt, but which one is more effective?

In the struggle for African-American civil rights and equality in the USA, there were two main philosophies/strategies employed:  one philosophy/strategy was exemplified by people such as Rosa Parks, SNCC (early), the Freedom Riders, and Martin Luther King, Jr.  . . . passive, non-violent resistance ("turn the other cheek"); the other philosophy/strategy was exemplified by people such as Malcolm X, SNCC (later), and the Black Panther Party for Self-Defense ("an eye for an eye").  These philosophies/strategies were also employed by many other people of the USA (and world) seeking equality and civil rights, including women, Chicanos, Asian-Americans, Native Americans, and many more.



Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Famous Letter:

LETTER FROM BIRMINGHAM JAIL (excerpts)

April 16, 1963

MY DEAR FELLOW CLERGYMEN:

While confined here in the Birmingham city jail, I came across your recent statement calling my present activities "unwise and untimely". . . .

I think I should indicate why I am here In Birmingham, since you have been influenced by the view which argues against "outsiders coming in". . . .

Moreover, I am cognizant of the interrelatedness of all communities and states. I cannot sit idly by in Atlanta and not be concerned about what happens in Birmingham. Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. Never again can we afford to live with the narrow, provincial "outside agitator" idea. Anyone who lives inside the United States can never be considered an outsider anywhere within its bounds. . . .

You deplore the demonstrations taking place in Birmingham. But your statement, I am sorry to say, fails to express a similar concern for the conditions that brought about the demonstrations. I am sure that none of you would want to rest content with the superficial kind of social analysis that deals merely with effects and does not grapple with underlying causes. It is unfortunate that demonstrations are taking place in Birmingham, but it is even more unfortunate that the city's white power structure left the Negro community with no alternative. . . .

We know through painful experience that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed. Frankly, I have yet to engage in a direct-action campaign that was "well timed" in the view of those who have not suffered unduly from the disease of segregation. . . .

You speak of our activity in Birmingham as extreme. At first I was rather disappointed that fellow clergymen would see my nonviolent efforts as those of an extremist. I began thinking about the fact that I stand in the middle of two opposing forces in the Negro community. One is a force of complacency, made up in part of Negroes who, as a result of long years of oppression, are so drained of self-respect and a sense of "somebodiness" that they have adjusted to segregation. . . . The other force is one of bitterness and hatred, and it comes perilously close to advocating violence. It is expressed in the various black nationalist groups that are springing up across the nation, the largest and best-known being Elijah Muhammad's Muslim movement. . . .

I wish you had commended the Negro sit-inners and demonstrators of Birmingham for their sublime courage, their willingness to suffer and their amazing discipline in the midst of great provocation. One day the South will recognize its real heroes. . . . One day the South will know that when these disinherited children of God sat down at lunch counters, they were in reality standing up for what is best in the American dream and for the most sacred values in our Judaeo-Christian heritage, thereby bringing our nation back to those great wells of democracy which were dug deep by the founding fathers in their formulation of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. . . .

Yours for the cause of Peace and Brotherhood,

Martin Luther King, Jr.

 
Malcolm X's Famous Speech:

The Ballot or the Bullet (excerpts)

by Malcolm X
April 3, 1964
Cleveland, Ohio

. . . Black people are fed up with the dillydallying, pussyfooting, compromising approach that we've been using toward getting our freedom. We want freedom now, but we're not going to get it saying "We Shall Overcome." We've got to fight until we overcome. . . .

Our gospel is black nationalism. We're not trying to threaten the existence of any organization, but we're spreading the gospel of black nationalism. . . . Join any organization that has a gospel that's for the uplift of the black man. And when you get into it and see them pussyfooting or compromising, pull out of it because that's not black nationalism. We'll find another one.

And in this manner, the organizations will increase in number and in quantity and in quality, and by August, it is then our intention to have a black nationalist convention which will consist of delegates from all over the country who are interested in the political, economic and social philosophy of black nationalism. . . . We want to hear new ideas and new solutions and new answers. And at that time, if we see fit then to form a black nationalist party, we'll form a black nationalist party. If it's necessary to form a black nationalist army, we'll form a black nationalist army. It'll be the ballot or the bullet. It'll be liberty or it'll be death. . . .

. . . Last but not least, I must say this concerning the great controversy over rifles and shotguns. The only thing that I've ever said is that in areas where the government has proven itself either unwilling or unable to defend the lives and the property of Negroes, it's time for Negroes to defend themselves. Article number two of the constitutional amendments provides you and me the right to own a rifle or a shotgun. It is constitutionally legal to own a shotgun or a rifle. This doesn't mean you're going to get a rifle and form battalions and go out looking for white folks, although you'd be within your rights -- I mean, you'd be justified; but that would be illegal and we don't do anything illegal. If the white man doesn't want the black man buying rifles and shotguns, then let the government do its job. . . .

. . . No, if you never see me another time in your life, if I die in the morning, I'll die saying one thing: the ballot or the bullet, the ballot or the bullet. . . .

 
Try an MLK, Jr. video clip to get you in the mood:


Or, maybe a clip from Malcolm:

 
 
 . . . and now for your homework questions (10 points, due by 11:59pm on 4/20/12, first name, last initial, class period) . . .
1) which man do you think had a more effective strategy in the struggle for African-American civil rights and equality?
2) what specific historical evidence or specific evidence from today do you have to support your answer to Q1?
3) if you had been around in the late 1950s/early 1960s, which strategy would you have supported and why?  (create a plausible persona for yourself and then answer this question -- are you:  male or female? age? location? race/ethnicity? occupation? etc.)

. . . oh, by the way . . . your Ch. 37-39 MC Test (~65-70 points) is Wednesday 4/18/12, and your DBQ (the last one ever in this class is Friday 4/20/12) . . . be sad . . . be very , very sad :-(

Monday, April 9, 2012

Johnson Famous Political Commercial Homework

View this 1964 presidential campaign ad from the Lyndon Johnson campaign.  This political ad apparently only ran on TV one time, but was very effective in helping to paint Johnson's opponent, Barry Goldwater, as an extremist. 

Your homework (10 points) is to comment to this blog post (first name, last initial, class period) with the following by 11:59pm on Friday 4/13/12:
1) discuss (that means with explanation) whether you feel this ad is: A. effective, and B. fair 

2) discuss (that means with explanation) your feelings about negative political campaign ads in general

3) find another presidential (or congressional or state or foreign) political attack ad on YouTube that really gets to you (good or bad, funny or sad) and A. describe the ad (what year, what candidates, what issues), B. explain why it got to you, and C. give the YouTube URL so that others might enjoy it, at least from a non-school computer:(    

. . . keep it clean and unique!

Good Luck!

Monday, April 2, 2012

HUAC vs. the Hollywood Ten . . . HUAC 10, Hollywood Ten 0?; McCarthy vs. the Army, 1954 . . . Army legal counsel 1, McCarthy 0?

Just to get you in the mood for your homework (see previous post below!) . . .

This first clip is a BBC documentary on the Hollywood Ten (HUAC vs. Hollywood Ten hearings footage begins at around 1:20).




This second clip is an edited exchange between legal counsel for the army Joseph Welch and Senator Joe McCarthy (R-Wisconsin) on June 9, 1954 during the height of the Second Red Scare.


This is credited by many as the moment where McCarthy began to lose his power and influence, as the hearings were broadcast on TV (this was day 30 of the hearings), and people got to see how McCarthy behaved while accusing Fred Fisher, one the young lawyer's at Welch's law firm, of being a part of the National Lawyer's Guild (a group J. Edgar Hoover had sought to label as a communist-front group) while Fisher had been in law school . . . enjoy (it starts getting good around the 2:30 minute mark).

Are You Guilty by Suspicion?


The era of HUAC and McCarthy  . . . ponder the following questions and add a comment (with some in-depth explanation!) that addresses at least two:
1) Should people be held accountable today for their words, actions, and personal associations (aka, "friends") from 10 or more years ago?
2) Would you rat out your friends to keep yourself from getting into trouble?
3) Are you now, or have you ever been, a communist (look it up if your confused on what a communist/communism might be)?
4) Was McCarthy a patriot or a villain?

Good luck!

This is due by 11:59pm on Wednesday 4/4/12. 
First name, last initial, class period.
10 points.

Friday, March 16, 2012

The Comprehensive Quarter Test to End All Quarter Tests . . . 3rd Quarter That Is!

Your Quarter 3 Comprehensive Test will:
  • be on Thursday 3/22/12
  • be ~80 multiple choice questions, with your best 70 graded (aka, "10 bonus questions")
  • cover everything in USA history from the time when there wasn't a USA (dinosaurs perhaps, or at least pre-Columbus) through the beginning of the Cold War (Ch. 37)
  • be the last grade for the third quarter

Things to Study (in rank order of importance):
  • your Unit Tests from 23-26, 27-28, 29-1/2 30, 1/2 30-31, 32-34, 35-36
  • your notes on the Cold War
  • your Semester 1 Final Exam
  • your Quarter 1 Comprehensive Test
  • all other tests from Semester 1
  • online practice test materials (see blog links)
  • your prayer manual (...if you have one!)

Good Luck . . . and don't be like Phillip (see cartoon above if confused)!

Monday, March 12, 2012

It's Mini-Test Time Again . . . Ch. 35-36 WWII!

Thursday 3/15/12 . . .  ~40 points (plus bonus), including a special timed reading section . . . DBQ Friday 3/16/12 . . . you're welcome!

How about a video first?  If you are a history buff, you might like this YouTube clip of a PowerPoint on WWII in Europe.


Now check out some documents, cartoons, etc.!

1) Who, or what, was "America First" during World War II?

2) Who is napping in this cartoon, and what woke him/her/it up?


3) What does the cartoonist see as a problem in the USA during the war?  How does this cartoon relate to the next cartoon?


4) What is a "5th Column?"  What can you infer about the cartoonist's feelings toward Japanese-Americans during World War II from this cartoon?  How does this cartoon relate to the previous cartoon?
5) Read the document below:
  • Where did Stimson feel the strength of the Japanese lay in the summer of 1945?
  • What fears did Stimson have about the Japanese government?
  • What did Stimson feel was the likely outcome of the war if the atomic bomb were not used?
  • What is the main message Stimson was trying to put forward regarding the use of the bomb?



6) Read the document below:
  • How did Truman justify the use of the atomic bomb against the Japanese?
  • Why was he giving this address?




7) Read the documents below:
  • What is the conclusion Arnold came to about the condition of Japan before the use of the atomic bomb?
  • Did Eisenhower agree or disagree with Arnold's assessment of the condition of Japan?
  • What was the point Eisenhower was trying to make about why it was, or was not, necessary to use the atomic bomb?


8) Does the term "appeaser" have a positive or negative connotation?  What is the cartoonist implying in this cartoon, and who might "the appeaser" be (the cartoon was published August 13, 1941)?

 9) For an animated map and some basic information on the Holocaust, click here.

10) And last, but not least, Donald Duck goes to war (1943) . . . check out the good duck/bad duck routine . . . how does this relate to the "Zoot Suit Riots" in Los Angeles?